| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 815
| KProbe at high speeds I just received my Lite on drive, so naturally I have having plenty of fun with KProbe. One trend I have noticed is that my CD-R discs (RiTEK or T-Y) show very high error rates when the speed reaches about 46X. If I scan again at 40X the error levels are quite acceptable. I would think that it's a jitter issue. Is this normal behaviour? The first image is a scan at max speed (which is 48X for this drive.) The second image the same disc scanned at 40X. Yes, I do sense that there is a difference between these scans. (sarcasm)
__________________ DVD DL Writer = BenQ DW1620 OEM @ 1620Pro (RPC1 FW B7V9) DVD DL Writer = NEC ND-3500AG (Official FW 2.19) |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: on your computer
Posts: 3,619
| Re: KProbe at high speeds that just proves to you at 48x speed that the disk is not as reliable as 40x. Theres nothing wrong with kprobe. Run Nero speed disk and see if you get any dips in reading speed at max.
__________________ Current DVD Hardware: 8x: Liteon SOHW-832, Benq DW822, NEC ND-2500 12x: LG GSA-4120, Plextor PX-712A 16x: Pioneer DVR-108, Benq DW-1620A, Benq DW1655, NEC ND3500A, Plextor PX-716A, LG LG4163, Liteon SOHW-1693, NEC 4550, Pioneer DVR-111D 18x: Plextor 760A |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 111D problems at high speeds | Saucerful | Asus / Pioneer Burner | 7 | 14-02-2007 00:30 |
| When can high kprobe spikes be ignored? | ripit | Blank Media | 2 | 02-03-2005 20:55 |
| High scanning speeds = lower errors? | rdgrimes | Blank Media | 6 | 02-07-2004 02:16 |
| ASUS vs. LiteON (esp. @ high speeds) | shuss | General Hardware Forum | 39 | 17-02-2004 20:16 |
| Why are the burning speeds so high on this CD-RW | HarryMangurian | LiteOn / PLDS/ Sony Burner | 1 | 06-01-2004 07:04 |