| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| New on Forum Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3
| Questions from the New Guy, with a DW1620 Scan First of all, as I delurk, let me say I've already gotten alot of great info here, which I greatly appreciate. I purchased my first burner recently, and have made a few backups. I've attached one of my first scans to this post, for which I'd appreciate any feedback. I also have several questions, some of which are admittedly better asked in alternate forums, and I apologize in advance for those out of place. Regarding my scan: - A total PIE of 38748 seems excessive, even with max of 166? - The spike on PIE at the end of the burn? - And maybe I'm just dumb, but what is the green line? Read speed? - Comments regarding others burning with same media appreciated. Regarding scans in general: - If I understand correctly, in a nutshell, PIE are initial, recoverable errors and PIF are subsequent attempts at recovery which unrecoverably fail. Is this correct? - If so, an arbitrarily large number of PIE is acceptable, but not PIF. Correct? - The limits I've read for PIE (280) and PIF (16) apply to maximum, not total, which I assume deals with any one particular frame? - What visual artefact is manifested by PIF? If I remember correctly, MPEG2 is essentially blocks of 8x8 pixels, with changes between iterations of the block recorded, but I may be way off too. Regarding compression ratios: I understand the best way to determine acceptable compression ratios is simply to try and judge for myself. I would however be curious what the "gut feeling" is for various people. I have tried 66% and, on admittedly very little inspection, not seen obvious degradation. I appreciate any and all responses. cheers, Karjan |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 554
| Re: Questions from the New Guy, with a DW1620 Scan Quote:
For most people how much you compression is very subjective. There's some that claim they can tell a difference from anything more then 95% and for others 65% compression would look identical to the DVD. I have used 65% and I could tell a difference with DVD Shrink, now with an encoder like DVD Rebuilder and Procoder 2.0 it may be darn close to the actual DVD even at 65%.
__________________ Asus A78NX/Barton 2500 BenQ DW1620 Lite-on LTR-52246S | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,260
| Re: Questions from the New Guy, with a DW1620 Scan good scans
__________________ 2xBENQ DW1620 BenQ DW1620Pro BenQ DW1625 BenQ DW1640 LG GSA-4163B 2xTDK440N Iomega 4X Super DVD TDK882 NEC2510A 2xTDK1208B TDK 1616DLN i luv my 16x BenQ so Much and luv the new BenQ LightScribe 1625 |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New guy with questions | BIG BEAR | DVDFab / DVD Region+CSS Free | 5 | 31-08-2007 19:54 |
| help the new guy a couple of easy questions | uawaterskier | Newbie Forum | 19 | 25-06-2007 06:43 |
| DW1620 scan Problem. Help please. | viewer | BenQ / Philips Burner | 2 | 25-05-2005 16:31 |
| New guy with a few questions | griff | Newbie Forum | 2 | 18-02-2005 16:51 |
| A couple of questions from the new guy | miboesch | Newbie Forum | 11 | 04-06-2004 16:35 |