Go Back   Club CDFreaks - Knowledge is Power > International Chat: Hardware related > CD and DVD Burners > BenQ / Philips Burner


Commercial message



BenQ / Philips Burner Discuss, MCC 003 - What do you say? at CD and DVD Burners forum; Hi to all! This is my first posting here! I have read some hours here before I decided to buy a Benq 1620 Burner! Thank you for your help! Now I did my first burn and wanted to know if it is o.k.! Some infos before: Burner came surprisingly


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 20-01-2005   #1 (permalink)
New on Forum
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 1
MCC 003 - What do you say?

Hi to all!

This is my first posting here! I have read some hours here before I decided to buy a Benq 1620 Burner! Thank you for your help! Now I did my first burn and wanted to know if it is o.k.!
Some infos before:
Burner came surprisingly with fw B7S9 out of the box ( I bought it in Austria). I upgraded to B7T9 and Qscan said I cannot burn my Verbatim Datalifeplus (MCC 003) wit 8x, 12x and 16x, only 4x was o.k. Then I downgraded directly to B7P9 and qscan said 8x is o.k., but 12x not.
Nevertheless I tried 12x with the create datadisk option on Nero cdspeed. Then I scanned the disk and came to the following results.
Btw: Burning time was 6:50 with 12x. Is that normal?
Disk brand as mentioned: Verbatim datalifeplus. Made in Taiwan
__________________
System:

AMD 2600 XP+ Barton
Asus A7N8X deluxe V 2.0 (Nforce Drivers 5.10)
Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT
BenQ 1620pro (B7P9)
Samsung SP 1614N
2x Samsung DDR400 256 MB RAM
Levicom Blackline 350W
Logitech MX510
Hupi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005   #2 (permalink)
CD Freaks Senior Member
 
insaneoctane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles (ish)
Posts: 254
Re: MCC 003 - What do you say?

Qscan is not absolute. Many of us, here, think it might need another revision to be more accurate- especially the smartscan. Smartscan typically contradicts what a full scan at any given speed will say. Anyway, your burn looks good. Your PIEs are VERY low, and your PIFs are all in the green (11 max). Your quality score is 94. The author of CD Speed, Erik Deppe, says anything over 90 is an EXCELLENT burn, and I agree. If you REALLY want to have confidence in your burns (since your new to this drive), run transfer tests, too, and see if they are solid. Welcome
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------
My BenQ 1620 is AMAZING! A 16x DVD-R Burn A 12x DVD-R Burn
insaneoctane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005   #3 (permalink)
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 719
Re: MCC 003 - What do you say?

Agreed, that burn is certainly good enough, but I prefer to burn MCC003 at 8x, because at that speed the results are excellent. It only takes a couple minutes extra.
Xterminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005   #4 (permalink)
CD Freaks Senior Member
 
cor808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Zundert, Netherlands
Posts: 250
Re: MCC 003 - What do you say?

This is certainly not a good burn, although Quality score is 94%. PIE results are good, but that's not the problem. What is more important are the PIF results.
The clustered PI Failures at 3GB and just past 4GB are not good and can have a negative effect on the playback issues. Burn the disc at 8x and you'll probably have a great scan and disk without playback issues. Go for quality and not for speed.
Those things don't go always together. But's that's my 2 cents.
cor808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005   #5 (permalink)
CDFreaks Resident
 
Braxas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,285
Re: MCC 003 - What do you say?

The clustered PI Failures are bad at the end but I'd keep the disc personally. It's still in that passable range I look for with no max PI Failures going over 16 - as long as they don't go over that mark even with clusters I figure the disc will play back in most dvd players I throw it at. The real test is would that disc play back in stand-alone dvd players or not? That's the question you really have to ask and check on.
__________________

...I will NEVER buy another Lite-On Product...
BenQ DW1620 DVD-Burner w/B7U9 Firmware
Samsung TS-H492A CD-RW/DVD Combo drive w/TB02 Firmware
Mad Dog Dominator 6-in-1 (NEC ND2510A) w/2.F9 Firmware
Abit AI7 uGuru motherboard
Pentium 4 2.4 Gigahertz
800 megahertz FSB
512 (2x256)megs of Kingston PC-3200 DDR
1 Gigabyte (2x512) megs of Kingmax PC-3200 DDR
1.5 gigabytes total PC-3200 DDR Memory
2x80 gigabyte Western Digital Special Edition 8 megabyte buffer 7200 RPM IDE Hard Drives
Radeon 9600SE 128 megabyte video card
Braxas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-01-2005   #6 (permalink)
CD Freaks Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 30
Re: MCC 003 - What do you say?

do a 16X test and see if you still get 90+ score on cdspeed. If yes, i'll say it's a keeper.
wity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-01-2005   #7 (permalink)
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,037
Re: MCC 003 - What do you say?

MCC 003 12X 6:39 mn

Normal I think !
Attached Images
File Type: png MCC 003_M_Pieg_12X_B7T9qual97.png (30.6 KB, 90 views)
__________________
Benq 1620 B7W9 (retired)
Benq 1640 BSPB
Benq 1655 BCGB (MCSE)
LG 4163B A105
Liteon 1633S@1653S CSOP(retired)
Asus 1608P3S@Pioneer111L 8.29 (TDB + ala42's readspeed patch)
Sapa is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


If you can't find where you are looking for, then become a member and get an answer fast! We have thousands of people online every moment of the day to help you! Click here



Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MCC 003 Question bpinn Blank Media 6 08-03-2007 03:30
Which is better, YUDEN000T02 or MCC 003 Jonathan987 Blank Media 7 21-02-2006 13:15
head to head: mcc 003 and mcc 004 on nec 3540a 1.03 er557 NEC / Optiarc Burner 14 13-10-2005 20:13
Fake mcc 003? ike Blank Media 22 15-06-2005 22:56
MCC 003 or RICOHJPNR02 ?? Shin_79 Blank Media 7 16-10-2004 11:43


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0