DVD2ONE vs 1.1.3 versus 1.2.0 - Club CDFreaks

Milkman · 21-06-2003

I tried both version, using a big file movie (7.33 GB), and to my surprise I got better results using old version versus new one ("Constant Ratio" option) . New version is more "blocky" especially in fast scene.
To made the encoding I used a very big movie including the two biggest audio files (dolby 5.1 and DTS). The idea was to push both transcoders to the limit to see which one can produce better results...

Any ideas or comments?

Milkman · 21-06-2003

Last night I made more test and found that when using "Variable Rate" option in new version I got similar results as using v1.1.3.

So, is a good choice to use "Constant Rate" for long movies?

21-06-2003	#1 (permalink)
Milkman CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 82	DVD2ONE vs 1.1.3 versus 1.2.0 <a href='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a13febf7&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=30&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a13febf7' border='0' alt='' /></a> I tried both version, using a big file movie (7.33 GB), and to my surprise I got better results using old version versus new one ("Constant Ratio" option) . New version is more "blocky" especially in fast scene. To made the encoding I used a very big movie including the two biggest audio files (dolby 5.1 and DTS). The idea was to push both transcoders to the limit to see which one can produce better results... Any ideas or comments?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New Version DVD2one Released (DVD2one v2.0.6)	BeLooken	DVD2One	0	29-09-2006 05:28
NeroAPI versus NeroVisionAPI	kbrown66	Nero SDK Discussion Forum	0	20-09-2005 00:17
plus versus minus??	BigSlammy	Newbie Forum	3	05-01-2004 22:11
ATA100 versus U-ATA133 ?	mu_zik	Dutch: De Woonkamer	4	01-11-2003 13:37
Problems with Jackie Brown and both DVD2one 1.13 and DVD2one 1.20	Rory Breaker	DVD2One	5	04-07-2003 13:12

Commercial message
<a href='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a5c5554b&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=29&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a5c5554b' border='0' alt='' /></a>

21-06-2003	#2 (permalink)
Milkman CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 82	Last night I made more test and found that when using "Variable Rate" option in new version I got similar results as using v1.1.3. So, is a good choice to use "Constant Rate" for long movies?