Data Position Measurement.... - Club CDFreaks

*Maelstrom* · 29-12-2002

You can select a reading speed for the DMP funtion.
my question is:
does it matter what speed you choose?
is 1X speed better than eg 48X speed? if so what is a good balance between quality and speed? reading at 1 speed takes an awefull long time.
does the device have any influence on the quality of the DPM? or will any drive do.

VLuka · 30-12-2002

Slower DPM speed = better results. But just try at faster speed and see if the copy works. And yes - drive used matters too.

FirePhenix · 21-01-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by VLuka
Slower DPM speed = better results. But just try at faster speed and see if the copy works. And yes - drive used matters too.

Hi, Could you tell me how to get DPM infomation and how to use the DPM info? I have great interesting on that.
thank you very much in advance!

VLuka · 22-01-2003

You can find detailed walkthrough for using RMPS/DPM in Alcohol here: http://forum.alcohol-software.com/in...ST&f=18&t=1531

luciano · 22-01-2003

DPM at 1x takes only 5-7 minutes: it isn't a lot of time...anyway, also 4x is good.

*Maelstrom* · 22-01-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by luciano
DPM at 1x takes only 5-7 minutes: it isn't a lot of time...anyway, also 4x is good.

when i used 1X reading speed for the DPM i took me 15 minutes just to reach 18%

FirePhenix · 24-01-2003

Quote:

Originally posted by Maelstrom

when i used 1X reading speed for the DPM i took me 15 minutes just to reach 18%

I think that there may have great difference between diff CD/DVD ROMS.

*VeNoM386* · 24-01-2003

@Maelstrom: this means you have a very good device - it supports REAL 1x speed - many devices in fact work at higher speed even if you select 1x. You will get highest quality DPM information in you image but at the cost of long dumping of course.
You can also try to use 2x - most likely your device will support it too. Practically same high quality, bit a bit faster. I think in many cases it is worth waiting if you want to get high quality image.

Tron · 24-01-2003

Yes, the slower speeds are preferable if you want the quality. Not too many drives will go down that slow anymore....

29-12-2002	#1 (permalink)
Maelstrom CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Behind Enemy Lines Posts: 746	Data Position Measurement.... You can select a reading speed for the DMP funtion. my question is: does it matter what speed you choose? is 1X speed better than eg 48X speed? if so what is a good balance between quality and speed? reading at 1 speed takes an awefull long time. does the device have any influence on the quality of the DPM? or will any drive do. __________________ The sound of thousand warriors The fields of thousand battles Still, in our hearts we can hear the great hymn of Karelia.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
DVR-110D and DPM Measurement	trevaaar	Asus / Pioneer Burner	2	07-11-2006 14:43
Jitter Measurement for LiteOn Drive	Wind	LiteOn / PLDS/ Sony Burner	2	19-05-2006 10:53
[Media quality measurement] Which to trust for PI/PIF Measurement?	lui_gough	Blank Media	13	29-03-2005 13:42
Data Position Measurement ???	eman	Burning Software	1	30-10-2002 04:29
Nero 5.5.8.2 - Speed Measurement Question	millsy	Burning Software	1	14-07-2002 12:41

Today
CD Freaks	__________________ This advertising will not be shown to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on Club CD Freaks - Knowledge is Power

30-12-2002	#2 (permalink)
VLuka New on Forum Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 26	Slower DPM speed = better results. But just try at faster speed and see if the copy works. And yes - drive used matters too.

22-01-2003	#4 (permalink)
VLuka New on Forum Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 26	You can find detailed walkthrough for using RMPS/DPM in Alcohol here: http://forum.alcohol-software.com/in...ST&f=18&t=1531

22-01-2003	#5 (permalink)
luciano CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: ITALY Posts: 91	DPM at 1x takes only 5-7 minutes: it isn't a lot of time...anyway, also 4x is good.

24-01-2003	#8 (permalink)
VeNoM386 DAEMON Tools Author Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 21	@Maelstrom: this means you have a very good device - it supports REAL 1x speed - many devices in fact work at higher speed even if you select 1x. You will get highest quality DPM information in you image but at the cost of long dumping of course. You can also try to use 2x - most likely your device will support it too. Practically same high quality, bit a bit faster. I think in many cases it is worth waiting if you want to get high quality image.

24-01-2003	#9 (permalink)
Tron Alcohol 120% Software Support Team Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 43	Yes, the slower speeds are preferable if you want the quality. Not too many drives will go down that slow anymore....

Commercial ads