| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| New on Forum Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7
| Making A Trilogy Hello I would like help on how to make 'The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy' I am trying to put all 3 films onto 1 dvdr I have converted the fist and second movies into DivX and then used another copy of the second film inplace of the third When I use tools such as Ulead DVD Workshop it says that the DVD it is going to make is 56GB, When I use DVDit it says 36GB The File size of the 1st and 2nd are 1.5GB, so how can it need that amount of space? If anybody know how I can make the trilogy please help me? Plz Reply NSC |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,941
| it would need that much space cuz u're failing to burn them as data, but rather as dvd-video, which would convert them into dvd-video streams.
__________________ Vob Blanker | DvdReMake (Pro) I don't respond to questions through PM that should be asked in the forum |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Resigned Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: U.K.
Posts: 484
| What you're asking can be done. However, the quality would not be DVD, probably not even SVCD. It would be something like VHS. These are lengthy movies and require a fair amount of compression just to get one of them off a DVD9 and onto a DVD5. To tackle the problem I would demux the originals into separate video and audio streams. If I wanted subtitles I would need to demux these too. I would then use an authoring tool such as Vegas to concatenate the three movies and to re-render them in a format that would permit the new three-part movie to fit on one DVD. I would probably have to do some trial and error tests here, but almost certainly I would finish up with a smaller frame than the standard PAL or NTSC size used in DVDs. Moreover, I would have to pull the bitrate down to a low, low level. If you're with me so far, you'll realise that this is not a domain where quality reigns! I would also need to decide whether playback would always take place on a computer, or whether a stand-alone DVD player would be used as well. The answer would influence the choice of CODEC (some are more efficient than others, but not all stand-alone players can 'understand' them). The time and effort involved, to say nothing of the cost of the authoring tools and encoder(s) - which you clearly don't possess, to arrive at such inevitably disappointing results militate against it. I'd say forget it. -Pete |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Resigned Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: U.K.
Posts: 484
| Can I ask you a question first? Why is it so important, this cramming of several long - almost 3 hour each - movies onto one disc? Are you intrigued by the theoretical possibility, or is there some practical reason? ![]() -Pete |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| If you can't find where you are looking for, then become a member and get an answer fast! We have thousands of people online every moment of the day to help you! Click here |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Back To The Future Trilogy poor quality | Macrovision3500 | CloneDVD | 4 | 03-12-2006 21:04 |
| Star Wars Trilogy Bonus Material | Digit@lskull | Copy Movie | 8 | 03-10-2004 18:09 |
| Indiana Jones DVD TRILOGY!!!! | BadASCII | CD Freaks Living Room | 8 | 07-09-2003 07:02 |
| Die Hard Trilogy | G@M3FR3@K | Dutch: De Woonkamer | 2 | 08-04-2000 20:50 |