| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| New on Forum Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 17
| Recording speed vs. recording quality Is there a clear rule regarding recording speed vs. quality? I am primarily interested in CD-R burns, but hey, we can expand this to DVD+/- burns as well! I have read the following two proclamations somewhere on CdFreaks.com: 1) audio burns best at 4x 2) best quality often at highest speeds I am not sure what to make of this, and since I am about to make a cd-r audio compilation for many people, I want the best quality end disks possible with my software/hardware/media. BTW, I am using tdk velocd 40/12/40 with Nero 6.3 and probably Fuji TY CD-r 48x media |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | ||||
| CD Freaks Audio Expert Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 940
| Re: Recording speed vs. recording quality Quote:
Quote:
4x is usually fine, but necessarily the best. Quote:
IMHO, high speeds are usually acceptable, good or even the best with high quality media. But with the wrong media, errors will grow exponentially with speed. Quote:
You would have to make C1, C2 errors tests to know which speed is the best in your system. I would use a CLV mode (constant speed) like 16x or 8x. | ||||
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: UK
Posts: 185
| My lite-on cdrw burns lower quality at 4x than at 52x. I just got a dvd burner 415S and 4x makes coasters where as 2x there dvds are readable, but i think its a media problem. Burning them at 24x or 32x should be more reliable than full speed burns and the difference in time between 32x and 52x is not enough unless your burning cds 24/7 Last edited by RaWShadow; 03-01-2004 at 17:43. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 967
| > 1) audio burns best at 4x > 2) best quality often at highest speeds As said before there's no general rule for this and it all depends on your drive and media. For a long time the lower speed you used, the better quality you got, following the absolute difficulty of the burning job. However recent drives (>40x) are optimized to offer the best burning quality at relatively high speeds (around 20x-32x), so 4x could be worse for these. Give it a try and find what's best for you. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| New on Forum Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
| Burn at 16x if your media supports it.There is no loss of quality.I repeat..there will be no loss of quality.To burn at 4x for audio would be a waste of your time and money.Avoid using cheap quality media .Cheap quality media burned at high speeds will not result in a loss of audio quaility but it may result in a coaster. Use decient media and you wont have any problems. Check the forum under media. Free your mind! TekLords
__________________ Free Your Mind! |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recording speed is down | NwChicago | DVDFab / DVD Region+CSS Free | 6 | 01-01-2007 08:52 |
| 165P6S and 165H6S the same recording quality? | AlKwas | LiteOn / PLDS/ Sony Burner | 3 | 09-11-2006 10:37 |
| Audio Master Quality Recording | VANT | Plextor Burner | 50 | 02-09-2006 08:30 |
| Recording speed | legrandmarc | CD and DVD Burners | 3 | 25-05-2005 18:33 |
| Sony DRU500A Recording Quality | mp3dom | CD and DVD Burners | 2 | 05-01-2003 20:02 |