Doesn't skip for me. I've done three at a time with no problems with the fully registered version. Works great!

Awesome ! I'm wanting to buy the registered version but my Discover card isn't accepted through that site. What method of payment did you chose to pay with? Also, when you did 3 at a time were you using your computer at the time and was that the recommended setting for you? One more thing, what are your computer specifications (motherboard, processor, and RAM) so I can get an idea as to if I need to upgrade or not.

Sorry for all the questions

I just registered so we'll see how this goes . . . but I gotta reboot first.

ok, im having a minor problem with the new version of muvaudio (btw, i have the trial) when i play my songs after theyve been converted, it repeatedly says, "trial" throughout the entire length of the song.....does anybody know anything about this or how to fix it

You answered your own question.

i have the registered version. i can do 3 at a time without problem. my comp specification is 2gbz and 512mb. works great so far. i wouldn't recommend going beyond 4 at a time.

MuvAudio v1.0 is EXCELLENT! My Pentium 4 2.80 GHz, 512 RAM computer can record 30 mins of music in about 10 minutes real time using the recommended 4 simultaneous VAC's (the maximum is 5, but I haven't tried it). The sound quality is superb. And background noises from Windows are no longer recorded. Great product, worth every cent. The closest thing to a WMA crack (for now).

MuvAudio records digitally right? I can't seem to verify this information.

yes it does, using a 3rd party application VAC or Virtual Audio Cable.

Thanks for the confirmation. Can this be blocked by DRM anyhow? I can't seem to think of a way. It seems like this is the most permanent solution.

Can it be blocked? Of course, anything can be stopped in one way or another.

It is however, unlikely, since Muvaudio uses Windows Media Player to play the encrypted WMAs. Since it's not its own player, it's more likely to be a semi-perm solution. It is possible Microsoft creates new DRM rules that won't allow WMAs to be played if it senses MuvAudio running, but it'll be awhile for that to happen anyway (and by then they'll be another solution thats better).

The new MuvAudio uses a plug-in or driver or whatever for the VAC capability. I saw on the internet that the license for that driver cost almost 35$. My question is: when I pay 18,99$ to register the new MuvAudio, will I have to pay for that driver too, or is it included in the big package ?

I am a fan of Tunebite, because it is much more simple to use. The MOVAUDIO user interface is very complicated and hard to use. Also I have had by testing several crashes, because I have no .NET framework or something like that and I do not want to download 20 or more MB only for using a tool. That is strange and makes no sense to me . So it brings me no fun.

By the way Tunebite is cheaper. The guys at Tunebite are pretty clever so I think they will release the MUVAUDIO speed feature in a few weeks, so I can get my Tunebite Update for free with the same feature but much more easier to handle and without download another Microsoft bull shit.

Ranzi is right. The secret of Tunebite is its ease of use. Everyone can use it.
I have also tested movaudio. The GUI is full of several functions, fields and buttons why so complicated for a simple function? The should get their money from the skin designer back.

You absolutely must have the .net platform installed if you want to use MuvAudio. Without it, it will crash. This isn't a bug - it's plainly stated as a requirement up front. You are going to find more and more applications that require .net and it will probably be bundled with the next release of Windows, so those reluctant to install it are just putting off the inevitable. It is transparent to the user, so I am not sure why people have an issue with it.

MuvAudio is an extremely unique software package because it bundles a third party utility (Virtual Audio Cable) with its own software. The purchase price covers both software components. MuvAudio is also fully digital so there is absolutely no change in the audio quality beyond the transcoding. There is no one second cut off problem. It is also faster. Don't hold your breath waiting for Tunebite to match this. The author of VAC spent a huge amount of time developing that package - it's not a weekend project. Instead of re-inventing the wheel and spending months building one's own utility, the author of MuvAudio simply licensed it, at a major discount to the end user, so we can get on with it. If there is a problem, there is a user forum right on the web site. Last time I checked, there was no support forum for Tunebite. Good luck with that.

As to the price difference, it's ONE DOLLAR and change and MuvAudio also gives you VAC. Oooh. The entire registration cost is about the same as purchasing one regular priced CD in a mall store.

As far as its compexity goes, if you spend a few minutes reading the documentation, you'll see it's not at all difficult. Most of what you see on the panel is set just once, saved, and never bothered with again. If you simply click on dedicated mode, any file you drag into a specific directory will automatically get converted. I don't see how that is complex. Take five minutes and learn the flexibility and power of the software and it won't look that hard anymore.

So I guess my question is answered, 18,99$ for the whole package.
As for the simplicity of use, lets face it, Tunebite is a lot easier to use, especially for the average user.
Anyway I have to say bravo for the new MuvAudio with the developing in the .NET interface and using that VAC capability.
But I will stay with Tunebite too, cause for the moment I don't need that extra speed from the VAC capability, and other great improvements I don't see, corect me if I'm wrong

I've used both Tunebite and the new MuvAudio. So far I've gotta give the edge to MuvAudio simply for the ability to convert four files at a time. That's very, very nice.

MuvAudio and Tunebite are no longer comparable. MuvAudio does a pure DIGITAL conversion. Also it won't record windows sounds when transcoding. End of story. Tunebite isn't even in the same league anymore.

I agree. Also, MuvAudio can record up to 5 songs at once.

The biggest advantage of MuvAudio is the speed, and that's about it...this is what makes it better from one point of view.
As for the pure DIGITAL conversion, there was already a discussion on this thread

... I believe you're mistaken. I think they ARE both in the same league. They both get the exact same job done. Now, can you honestly tell me you notice a difference in the pure digital copy and the copy Tunebite creates? I can honestly say I do not. If you do then I would say you do not have a great sound card to begin with.

I've supported Muvaudio for a while but my heart is still with Tunebite.

Ok I've downloaded Muvaudio and converted my music to MP3s. Now how do I get them onto my ipod? I can't seem to find out how anywhere I look. Thanks!

Your right, with a good soundcard the difference is unnoticable. However, Tunebite cannot copy 5x the speed like MuvAudio can, also with Tunebite you have to disable all other windows sounds or they too will be recorded (not the case with MuvAudio).

agreed

mlipod plugin for winamp if u don't want to use itunes