| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: England
Posts: 83
| multiple recorders when I try to burn more than one disk at a time (by opening clone more than once) the buffers some times run empty with 2 burners and always empty using 3 burners is this normal all burners are burning at max speed(24x) here is my system spec athlon 1100 plex 2410a primary slave liteon 24102b secondary master liteon 24103s secondary slave 30 gig fujitsu 10 gig ultra160 scsi hdd adaptec 29160 ultra 160 scsi adapter 768 meg 133 ram gigabyte m,board with via kt133 chipset I always read and write from the scsi hdd. any help would be appreciated. the disks still turn out ok because of buffer under run but can take a lot longer to burn. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Senior Moderator Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Utrèg, The Netherlands
Posts: 8,777
| Well I think it's pretty normal that you run out of buffer since three writers working at 24x would mean a whopping 10.8MB/s (3x3.6MB) and I don't think your harddisk or your CPU can handle this.
__________________ CDFreaks.com - Independent CD and DVD recording news around the clock!
|
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Expert Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 143
| well http://www.epepc.de/benchmarks/diskspeed32.zip gives me about 30 mb/sec but i get buffer underuns when writing at 24x. i think it's the cpu usage.when i write 24x i have about 80% cpu usage..on an athlon 800. that's sick! and it's not because of fragmentation , i tried. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: London, UK
Posts: 539
| Well, I don't have much experience of this (I only have 24x liteon and 8x plextor), but here's a suggestion: You're using slave and master for the liteon writers - this is a no no. Slave and master takes turn in using the cable - i.e. they can't use the cable at the same time and will poll and takes turns - also the IDE implementation is a bit crap for this. I know this because if you slave a HD with a fast DVD/CD drive and copy a file across, the whole system slows down. But if you separate them into 2 different IDE cables then there isn't a problem. You could try buying a PCI IDE card to give extra IDE slots. ![]() Last edited by Truman; 14-05-2002 at 21:26. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: England
Posts: 83
| Dont think cpu or hard drive is the prob cpu is only running at 25% max with all 3 burners writing, hard drive is ultra 160 scsi so that is not the prob IDE channels seem most likely, buffers all stay full at 16x though will try pci IDE card to get extra IDE channels and let you know |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Spain
Posts: 390
| Parker I can burn without problems three cd´s at the same time. The problem you have is that your recorders are IDE and they have more dependence of the cpu. In my case I have two plex 8x SCSI and one Plex 12x SCSI. I can open three windows of clonecd and The buffrer of the last two windows do not move. In my computer all is scsi and windows and applications goes perfect; ![]()
__________________ This is some of my little number of devices to test backups ![]() -Plexwriter 8/20 TLA#0403 -Plexwriter 8/2/20 TLA#0101 -Plexwriter Premium TLA #0000 -Plexwriter 12/10/32S TLA #0103 -ASUS CRW-5224A FW 1.1 -AOPEN CRW-5232 FW 1.05 -Ultraplex 40x -Ultraplex 32x -Plex 12/20 -Toshiba sdm-1401 SCSI -Toshiba sdm-1402 IDE -Toshiba sdm-1612 IDE -Plextor DVDR PX-716A TLA #0307 -Liteon ltd165h -LG GSA-4040b A303 -LG GSA-4082B A204 |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: England
Posts: 83
| tried extra ide channels but it made no difference. So I installed discjuggler and it burns to all 3 burners at the sime time perfectly with no emptying of the buffer I have also backed up GTA3 (SD 2.51) with DJ using the lite on and it installed and played ok in my other machine (sony vaio) with a pioneer 117 DVD. I think it might be because you can set the buffer up to 1 min of write time which at 24X is probably about 200 meg. Would it be possible for clone to use multiple recorders simultaneously in the future as I prefer to use it???? |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: England
Posts: 83
| just clicked ignore read errors in prefs and away it went took about 11 mins to read each disk but burnt in about 3min 30 sec for each disk, works perfectly. Discjuggler reads and writes in raw mode so I assume any software that reads and writes in raw will copy safedisc with right hardware DJ 4 also reads subchanel data. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Senior Admin Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: True Blue
Posts: 5,606
| Quote:
It's also coded to burn to more than 1 burner, NP as stated.
__________________ :ÐowN AsS ± ßû(r)NêR:
| |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| If you can't find where you are looking for, then become a member and get an answer fast! We have thousands of people online every moment of the day to help you! Click here |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Multiple Recorders | garras | General Hardware Forum | 1 | 29-11-2006 06:20 |
| Need help with Multiple recorders 6.6.0.6 | Mirage_Man | Nero & InCD | 2 | 26-01-2005 23:19 |
| Multiple recorders | Raymond Fenton | Nero & InCD | 2 | 02-12-2004 13:51 |
| Using Multiple Recorders | k1davis | Nero SDK Discussion Forum | 1 | 19-06-2004 15:29 |
| multiple recorders?????? | tony adams | Burning Software | 3 | 25-01-2002 14:13 |