| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: On the westside
Posts: 1,381
| What drive to test with. Which drive and firmware should I use for the most consistent tests? 166s or 401s or 811s ? ![]()
__________________ A warrior doesn't know remorse for anything he has done, because to isolate one's acts as being mean, or ugly, or evil is to place an unwarranted importance on ourselves.The trick is in what one emphasizes. We either make ourselves miserable or we make ourselves strong. The amount of the work is the same. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Author of NecDump Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 2,775
| Re: What drive to test with. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: ><)))°>
Posts: 117
| Re: What drive to test with. ... in any case you should take a burner, cause the results of 166 are faulty. I take my 401@811 . . and it works so far. I'm happy to compare the results with PlexTools, sometimes a big difference but not always ![]()
__________________ Benq DW-1625 #BBGA LG GSA-4163B #A104 NEC ND-3540AG #1.W3 Plextor PX-716A #1.07; Premium #1.05 Toshiba SD-M1712 #J004 RPC 1 |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: On the westside
Posts: 1,381
| Re: What drive to test with. Quote:
__________________ A warrior doesn't know remorse for anything he has done, because to isolate one's acts as being mean, or ugly, or evil is to place an unwarranted importance on ourselves.The trick is in what one emphasizes. We either make ourselves miserable or we make ourselves strong. The amount of the work is the same. | |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Germany
Posts: 164
| Re: What drive to test with. I also use the 811S for scanning and the 2500A for burning. But my 811S has a strange read issue which i cannot fix and therefor my scans are nothing but useless... I would buy a newer drive like the 812S or 832S for scanning because most people say the 811S is a bad drive in general (and i have to admit it is...). |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 107
| Re: What drive to test with. Yeah, from what I heard, 812S or 832S are pretty good for PI/PIF error scanning.
__________________ NEC 4570A @ 1.Z2 NEC 3500A @ 2.TG LiteOn 812S->832S --- RIP LiteOn 52246S @ 6S0F Plextor 1210A @ 1.10 |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: On the westside
Posts: 1,381
| Re: What drive to test with. I've been using the 811s with the HSOQ firmware. Since flashing the NEC with liggys flasher and the beta5 firmware reads have been very consistant, I think the 811s if fine for reading atleast!
__________________ A warrior doesn't know remorse for anything he has done, because to isolate one's acts as being mean, or ugly, or evil is to place an unwarranted importance on ourselves.The trick is in what one emphasizes. We either make ourselves miserable or we make ourselves strong. The amount of the work is the same. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Rookie Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 29
| Re: What drive to test with. What about Toshiba SD-M1802? http://hijacker.rpc1.org/toshiba_nolimit/ |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nero CD Speed Test - Missing Drive - Virtual Drive | n00b33 | Nero & InCD | 10 | 04-03-2007 09:11 |
| Drive test not working | ADT | Newbie Forum | 1 | 21-01-2006 00:06 |
| New drive - test - advice | Pluri | BenQ / Philips Burner | 2 | 08-04-2005 22:53 |
| NERO Test Drive | John Langton | NEC / Optiarc Burner | 2 | 07-04-2005 20:54 |
| best way to test drive | kvos | LiteOn / PLDS/ Sony Burner | 1 | 01-02-2003 06:43 |