| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| New on Forum Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3
| Difference between DVD+RW quick/full erase Hi, first sorry for my not perfectly english, but to my question: When I burn something to DVD+RW´s on my Lite-On 1633s (BSOK) I always have better quality, when I make full erase before burning. When I only quick erase the disc, the quality is not so good (but still acceptable). Is this normal or something is wrong? I see no difference in quality between quick/full erase by CD-RW... Here some scan´s: The first shows compilation burned after quick erase, the second shows the same compilation burned on the same disc after full erase. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Advisory Admin Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: In the pack
Posts: 10,119
| Re: Difference between DVD+RW quick/full erase Welcome ![]() Just a guess, but it may have something to do with the reflectivity of a disc that is erased, compared to one that has data on it already. *shrugs* As I say, just a guess though, but it does seem to make a difference.
__________________ http://codeguys.rpc1.org/ LiteOn Tools: EEPROM Utility <-- New v4.0.0, Flash Utility <-- New v3.0.2, Settings Utility Samsung Tools: Patch Utility <-- New v3.4.0 LiteOn Patches: Fast Read (FR) | Fast Burn (FB) | Enhanced OverSpeed (EOS) | Enhanced Online HyperTuning (EOHT) BenQ Patches: Fast Burn (FB) | Enhanced SolidBurn (ESB) Samsung Patches: Fast Read (FR) | Remove RipLock (RLR) | Fast Burn (FB) | Retain book type (BS) | Default DVD-ROM (ROMD) The man who does things makes mistakes, but he who doesn't makes the biggest mistake of all - doing nothing. Benjamin Franklin The Forum Rules Click HERE to join cdfreaks.com |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,226
| Re: Difference between DVD+RW quick/full erase @ sbehring I think a quick erase just deletes the Table Of Contents, whereas the full erase removes all data and writes just 0000.... A quick erase will leave the data which can be read by some programs, so if it is sensitive data, a full erase is better for security purposes. A full erase can also be better in some circumstances to start 'fresh' when problems arise with writing/reading. |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| If you can't find where you are looking for, then become a member and get an answer fast! We have thousands of people online every moment of the day to help you! Click here |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| quick erase or full erase? | loserbarrell | Blank Media | 12 | 31-07-2008 20:54 |
| How to erase(format) a full DVD+RW | zeroengr | Newbie Forum | 7 | 25-09-2007 11:18 |
| Full Format vs Erase (DVD-RW) | XPy | Burning Software | 5 | 24-06-2007 18:34 |
| Quick Erase vs. Full Erase | RZetlin | Nero & InCD | 1 | 30-12-2004 18:17 |
| Full + Quick Erase = Dead DVD+RW | BB88 | LiteOn / PLDS/ Sony Burner | 7 | 20-01-2004 01:27 |