| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Elite Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,531
| benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? I know, not another friggin what drive should I buy thread. I am helping a friend build a system (started out just helping him pick some parts but now think I might get stuck building it). He said something about paying me a little so no big deal (though I'm hoping he just wants help rather than me do it all for him). So is the benq 1620 still about the best for the money (about 45$ on newegg right now). I know that a 3500 would be beter but they are too hard to find and the places that have them want twice what the benq costs. I doubt very much that he would wait for a 3540 (0r the 1640). I'm guessing the 16x liteons (newer models, havent really followed them) are still not liked. For under 60$ avalable right now, is thier really anything beter? This would probably be his only drive and I'm not sure how savy he is to screwing with his firmware (might have to just find a good all around firmware that won't void his waranty and flash it to that for him). Any other contenders out thier (lg I guess but I'm not to farmiliar with them, not that I'm super farmiliar with the benq either). It can do error testing and bitsetting (not sure how many sheep it is) but thats two out of three and it's suposed to burn good with lots of media, right (I know it favors +)? On a side note, looking throught the benq forum, it seems that ty and mcc seem to be preferable with the 1620. Any other recomendations? Last edited by ripit; 30-04-2005 at 11:39. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Lost in America
Posts: 7,063
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? It depends on the media. If you look at my sig you will see the LG 4163 is more compatible with -R whereas the BenQ is better with -R. Also there are a lot of reports of early failures with BenQ so you might have to do some repairs. Otherwise, I think you are on target; the 3540 has firmware problems so far.
__________________ Still a few bugs in the system... |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Elite Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,531
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? I assume that you meant that the lg4163 is more compatible with -r and the benq is beter with +r? If you don't mind me asking (going blind researching parts for him), does the lg support bitsetting, error scanning and does it do ok with a range of - media or is it picky? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Lost in America
Posts: 7,063
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? Quote:
__________________ Still a few bugs in the system... | |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: UK
Posts: 112
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? How about the NEC3520A ? Most retailers are dropping the prices on this model just now, since the 3540 is just around the corner. I use a 3520 myself and (so far) it's been almost flawless with most media. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Retired Moderator & Reviewer Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Calgary, Alberta. Canada
Posts: 4,653
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? Quote:
![]()
__________________ My PC Specs. Plextor 760A/716A 1.07/1.10, BenQ DW1655, BCIB, BenQ DW1640 x2, BSLB, Nec 4551A, 1.08. Lite On SHM 165P6S/LH-20A1S, MS0R/9L05. LG GSA H22N/H62N, 1.02/CL01. SH-S203B, SB03. The Forum Rules Click here to join CDFreaks.com. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Lost in America
Posts: 7,063
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? I agree with crossg, especially as he has a 3520 and a Liteon and I assume he has compared scans. If I wanted quality burns as good as my 3500 I would use the LG with carefully selected media. If I could only have a single burner and the 3500 was off the table I would have the BenQ (with a spare standing by). Again, I would have to carefully select the media. So far the 3520 has not been that impressive and the 3540 has problematic firmware to work through. The next NEC I hold out hope for is the 4550. I have one open bay just waiting.
__________________ Still a few bugs in the system... |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 708
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? Everyone has their favorities based upon personal histories. I have had 3 Necs, 2 Liteons ,2 BenQ1620's and a Plextor 716A. To me it is not even close. I won't be buying anymore NECs or Liteons and although the Plextor 716A is fine it is not as good as the BenQ's so for me the BenQ 1620 is not the best bang for the buck it is the best bang period. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Elite Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,531
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? I just explained about various drives and let him make his own decision. He decided to get the benq 1620. Thier were some possibilities of getting a 3500 but for around 80-90$ so he decided to go with the benq for 45$ (he was ordering other stuff from newegg anyway). Thanks for the help everybody. I have been thinking about getting a benq to play with myself (it's only 45$) but seeing as I trashed both my computers this weekend (power supply died on one, started the other with the cpu fan unhooked and killed windows on both), I guess I should fix that before I buy any more toys (as if three burners wasn't enough already). |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Old Fart Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Lurking In The Back Of Your Mind
Posts: 6,112
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? Yo ripit- Sure hope that you have better luck with your 1620's than I am having with my new one- Just did a burn of four of my new movies - and the BenQ transcoding was wicked slow compared with my AOpen 1648/aap that it replaced - so it looks like the 1620 is going to replace the AOpen on the spare parts shelf- Mike
__________________ Mike Brayden & Lil Burnits Proud Cyber Grampie - 'CERCA, TROVA' - 'NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM' ![]() Be Kind To Older Folks - They Are A Reflection Of Yourself In The Future-eh!!! Work Computer= QuadCore Q6600 /4gb OCZ PC2 6400 DDR2 SDRAM /XP Pro-sp3 /(2) Seagate 500 gb HDD's /OCZ 600 watt psu /Optiarc 7200A w/v1.06 fw as Primary/Burner /LiteOn 20A4H w/vQP57 fw as Primary/Reader/Ripper/Disc Quality Testing /Sapphire ATi Radeon HD 4670 w/512mb GDDR3 Ram Videocard /Acer 22" LCD /Nero 6.6 /DVDFab Gold Burning Computer = AMD Opteron 180 /2gb G. Skill PC3200 DDR SDRAM /XP Home-sp3 /(2) 250gb Seagate SATA Hard Drives /Coolmax CUG-700 watt psu /Samsung 202G /LiteOn 20A4P /Pioneer 115D /BenQ 1640 x/flashed to EW 164B /Gigabyte ATi Radeon HD 3850 w/512mb GDDR3/256 bit Videocard /LCD ViewSonic 20.1" LCD /Nero 6.6 /DVDFab Gold On The Shelf: (2) LiteOn SHM-160P6S as backup, BenQ 1640, LG 4167, Liteon 1693, AOpen 1648/aap-pro |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Lost in America
Posts: 7,063
| Re: benq 1620 the best bang for the buck? Quote:
(I feel your pain). My AOpen performs flawlessly with USB2.
__________________ Still a few bugs in the system... | |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| If you can't find where you are looking for, then become a member and get an answer fast! We have thousands of people online every moment of the day to help you! Click here |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bang for the Buck | Brayshakes | Audio | 1 | 26-08-2006 08:20 |
| Bang for the Buck DVD burner | Ascii2 | CD and DVD Burners | 2 | 11-06-2006 12:53 |
| Best Bang For my Buck | budzos | General Hardware Forum | 12 | 31-01-2006 23:14 |
| LG 4040b at 119$ cdn....best bang for the buck | captqbec | CD and DVD Burners | 0 | 27-12-2003 12:42 |
| Whats a good *external* cd-rw most bang for the buck and a good usb 2.0 pci card? | imtim83 | General Hardware Forum | 1 | 06-12-2002 05:58 |