MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 - Club CDFreaks

achemen · 30-01-2008

Now that MKM 001 MIS is almost dried Up

Just want to make Comparision Between these Both.

i Am Easily Able to Burn the MKM 003 @ 8x on my Pioneer 112D

on thw Whole Which Media Yields Better results ?

fozzy99999 · 30-01-2008

I am seeing very comparable results, only difference is that my SH-S203B likes to burn the MKM003 faster

achemen · 30-01-2008

^^^ even my Pio 112D loves MKM 003

**Arachne** · 30-01-2008

I rather like MKM 003, very pretty scans and flawless TRTs.

Haven't had the privelege of trying MKM 001...yet.

achemen · 30-01-2008

^^^ kool

wat r u burning with ? a Pioneer ?

**Arachne** · 30-01-2008

LiteOn LH-20A1H, Samsung SH-S182D, and an LG E10N.

*terminalvelocd* · 31-01-2008

I actually prefer MKM 003.

Regards,
TerminalVeloCD

*NBR* · 31-01-2008

i wonder how MKM 003 (which are 8x right?) would burn on a older Lite-On 1673S (from 2005) ? ... max speed of my burner for dual layer media is 4x.... it burns MIS MKM 001 pretty good @ 4x.

(the firmware on my drive does support MKM 003 media code)

p.s. cause seeing how MKM 001 (MII) is turning out, which seems questionable... we need to get back to a reliable media , and maybe the MKM 003 are it.

*Albert* · 31-01-2008

MKM 003 wrote better scan-wise for me, but that is probably heavily influenced by drives' abilities [MKM 001 was written on older LiteOn SOHW-1633S, SOHW-1693S, and Sony DRU-810A, while MKM 003 was written on LiteOn LH-20A1H, Samsung SH-S182M, and probably Sony DRU-840A].

negritude · 31-01-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by achemen

Now that MKM 001 MIS is almost dried Up...

MIS MKM 001 is making a comeback in the states. I think Verbatim realized they made a mistake, and decided to mix production instead of going with Moser Baer exclusively.

*_chef_* · 31-01-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by negritude

MIS MKM 001 is making a comeback in the states. I think Verbatim realized they made a mistake, and decided to mix production instead of going with Moser Baer exclusively.

Really? Is there a package change too or just the "Made in info" obviously?

minaelromany · 31-01-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by _chef_

Really? Is there a package change too or just the "Made in info" obviously?

There are reports that say new packages are appearing as MIS although first wave was MII execlusively

beachbumm · 31-01-2008

the spindle on the left is 2006 and the spindle on the right is 2007, both MKM 001 MIS

beachbumm · 31-01-2008

better pic

*_chef_* · 31-01-2008

Thanks for your info & pics!

defier · 01-02-2008

My laptop burner writes dl at 2.4x so how would it go burning MKM 003 8x media at 2.4x? is it probably better to use MIS MKM 001 still?

beef barley · 01-02-2008

I personally haven't had an MKM 001 burn come close to this one, never mind the fact that the MKM 003 was burnt @10X.

MKM 003 burn

*cd pirate* · 01-02-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by defier

My laptop burner writes dl at 2.4x so how would it go burning MKM 003 8x media at 2.4x? is it probably better to use MIS MKM 001 still?

Yeah even 2.4x is slow for MKM001 IMO. Many newer writers have zero problems with them @ 4x.

I would burn MKM003 @ 4x or 6x. Probably 4x for best results. Testing it out is the best way to find out but I really wouldn't burn @ 2.4x because the 003 are designed for higher speed. It's like burning a 16x SL disc @ 4x, sometimes it will create more jitter and errors than higher speeds will.

defier · 01-02-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by cd pirate

Yeah even 2.4x is slow for MKM001 IMO. Many newer writers have zero problems with them @ 4x.

I would burn MKM003 @ 4x or 6x. Probably 4x for best results. Testing it out is the best way to find out but I really wouldn't burn @ 2.4x because the 003 are designed for higher speed. It's like burning a 16x SL disc @ 4x, sometimes it will create more jitter and errors than higher speeds will.

yeah i figured that would be the case. i better stick to the MKM001's then. thanks for the heads up.

30-01-2008	#1 (permalink)
achemen CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 437	MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 <a href='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a13febf7&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=30&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a13febf7' border='0' alt='' /></a> Now that MKM 001 MIS is almost dried Up Just want to make Comparision Between these Both. i Am Easily Able to Burn the MKM 003 @ 8x on my Pioneer 112D on thw Whole Which Media Yields Better results ?

30-01-2008	#2 (permalink)
fozzy99999 New on Forum Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 6	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 I am seeing very comparable results, only difference is that my SH-S203B likes to burn the MKM003 faster

30-01-2008	#3 (permalink)
achemen CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 437	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 ^^^ even my Pio 112D loves MKM 003

30-01-2008	#4 (permalink)
Arachne Senior Moderator & Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Keeping my media stash safe. Posts: 25,377	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 I rather like MKM 003, very pretty scans and flawless TRTs. Haven't had the privelege of trying MKM 001...yet. __________________ Current drives: Samsung SH-S203N (SB02 patched) + Pioneer DVR-115D (1.06) + Optiarc AD-5170S (1.12) + Litey LH-20A1H (LL0D) + Samsung SH-S182D (SB06 RPC1) x2 + Litey SHM-165P6S (MS0R) + LG E10N (JE07) + BenQ DW1650 (BCDC) x2 + Litey SHW-1635S (YV6P) x2 + BenQ DW1640@164B (BEFB) + LG 4167B (DL13 TDB) + Samsung SH-S162L (TS08) + NEC ND-4551A (1.Z2) + LG GCE-8520B (1.00) + LiteOn SOHR-5239S (2S0B) Retired: LiteOn LDW-851@SOHW-832 + LiteOn SOHW-1693S + LG 4163B My Review PCs How to delete your upper and lower filters : How to check/enable DMA by Womble Click here to join cdfreaks.com and be part of our friendly community! The CDFreaks Distributed Computing Teams need YOU! Join the Team(s) and help save some lives! Read more here

30-01-2008	#5 (permalink)
achemen CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 437	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 ^^^ kool wat r u burning with ? a Pioneer ?

Commercial message
<a href='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/ck.php?n=a5c5554b&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://adstats.cdfreaks.com/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=29&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a5c5554b' border='0' alt='' /></a>

30-01-2008	#6 (permalink)
Arachne Senior Moderator & Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Keeping my media stash safe. Posts: 25,377	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 LiteOn LH-20A1H, Samsung SH-S182D, and an LG E10N. __________________ Current drives: Samsung SH-S203N (SB02 patched) + Pioneer DVR-115D (1.06) + Optiarc AD-5170S (1.12) + Litey LH-20A1H (LL0D) + Samsung SH-S182D (SB06 RPC1) x2 + Litey SHM-165P6S (MS0R) + LG E10N (JE07) + BenQ DW1650 (BCDC) x2 + Litey SHW-1635S (YV6P) x2 + BenQ DW1640@164B (BEFB) + LG 4167B (DL13 TDB) + Samsung SH-S162L (TS08) + NEC ND-4551A (1.Z2) + LG GCE-8520B (1.00) + LiteOn SOHR-5239S (2S0B) Retired: LiteOn LDW-851@SOHW-832 + LiteOn SOHW-1693S + LG 4163B My Review PCs How to delete your upper and lower filters : How to check/enable DMA by Womble Click here to join cdfreaks.com and be part of our friendly community! The CDFreaks Distributed Computing Teams need YOU! Join the Team(s) and help save some lives! Read more here

31-01-2008	#7 (permalink)
terminalvelocd CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Western Australia Posts: 1,185	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 I actually prefer MKM 003. Regards, TerminalVeloCD __________________ TerminalVeloCD - ODD Enthusiast from Western Australia ASUS DRW-1608P, DRW-1608P3S, DRW-1814BL, DRW-1814BLT BenQ DW1620 Pro, DW1640, DW1650, DW1655 LG (HL-DT-ST) GSA-4163B, GSA-4167B, GSA-H10N, GSA-H22N, GH20NS10, GGC-H20L LiteON SOHW-1693S, LH-18A1P, LH-20A1P, DH20A4P NEC ND-2500A, ND-3500A, ND-3520A, ND-3540A Pioneer DVR-106D, DVR-107D, DVR-108, DVR-109, DVR-110D, DVR-111D, DVR-112D, DVR-212, DVR-115D, DVR-215, DVR-116D, DVR-216, BDR-101A, DVR-213LS Plextor PX-716A, PX-755SA, PX-760A, PX-760SA Shuttle CR40 Sony DRU-830A Sony NEC Optiarc AW-G170A, AW-G170S, AD-7200A, AD-7200S Samsung (SST Corp.) TS-H552U, SH-W162C, SH-S182D, SH-S203B, SH-S203D

31-01-2008	#8 (permalink)
NBR CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: USA Posts: 906	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 i wonder how MKM 003 (which are 8x right?) would burn on a older Lite-On 1673S (from 2005) ? ... max speed of my burner for dual layer media is 4x.... it burns MIS MKM 001 pretty good @ 4x. (the firmware on my drive does support MKM 003 media code) p.s. cause seeing how MKM 001 (MII) is turning out, which seems questionable... we need to get back to a reliable media , and maybe the MKM 003 are it.

31-01-2008	#9 (permalink)
Albert CDFreaks 'Dogbert' Resident Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 3,967	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 MKM 003 wrote better scan-wise for me, but that is probably heavily influenced by drives' abilities [MKM 001 was written on older LiteOn SOHW-1633S, SOHW-1693S, and Sony DRU-810A, while MKM 003 was written on LiteOn LH-20A1H, Samsung SH-S182M, and probably Sony DRU-840A]. __________________ Non-members: Free yourselves! >>>>Join CD Freaks!<<<< \|\|\| Members: Glad to have ya here! Read the forum rules, use your common sense, & we'll all get along just fine. Generic Responses For Newbies 101 Generic Responses For Newbies 102 "Alcohol is a major cause of a lot of DVD problems." [Source] And you thought that it was just bad to get intoxicated. Common interest: My media stash as of 9-19-08.

31-01-2008	#15 (permalink)
_chef_ CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: @FX labs .de ...watching [Benders.Big.Score] [Tripping.The.Rift.The.Movie] Posts: 24,199	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 Thanks for your info & pics! __________________ Started with burning capable optical drives (CD-R) in 1997. Bought optical drives from AOpen, HP, LiteOn, NEC, Philips, Pioneer, Plextor, Ricoh, Samsung, Sanyo, Toshiba and Yamaha. *'Things are now in motion that cannot be undone.' [Gandalf, LoTR]* Enable DMA with micrAp$0ft Enable DMA free at your will busTRACE => Upper/Lower Filters Util DevCon *HOW TO ... Delete the Upper & Lower Filters!* If you expect help then please start by using the powerful SEARCH.

01-02-2008	#16 (permalink)
defier New on Forum Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 8	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 My laptop burner writes dl at 2.4x so how would it go burning MKM 003 8x media at 2.4x? is it probably better to use MIS MKM 001 still? Last edited by defier; 01-02-2008 at 05:43.

01-02-2008	#17 (permalink)
beef barley CD Freaks Die Hard Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Canada Region 1 Posts: 1,794	Re: MKM 001 Vs MKM 003 I personally haven't had an MKM 001 burn come close to this one, never mind the fact that the MKM 003 was burnt @10X. MKM 003 burn __________________ System #1: Microsoft Windows Xp Pro 2002 SP3/Windows XP Pro X64 Edition 2003 SP2. AMD Phenom (tm) 9550 Quad Core Processor 2.20 GHz. 4 x 2GB of RAM. Samsung TSSTcorp SH-S203B (SB01 patched), Pioneer DVR-215D (1.18 patched), LG HL-DT-ST GSA H62N (CL01), Plextor PX-716A (1.11), BenQ #2 DW-1620 (B7W9) & externals BenQ #3 Ew-1621 (47P9), BenQ #1 EW-1621 (47L9), LG GSA-H10N (JL12). System #2: Microsoft Windows Xp Pro 2002 SP3. AMD Athlon(tm) 64 x 2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ 2.31 GHz 4 GBs RAM. Samsung SH-S182D (SB06), Samsung SH-S202J (SB01), Plextor PX-810SA (1.01), Samsung SH-S203B (SB03 FB FR). System specs as of 07052008

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Quality difference MKM 001/3	jcusimano2	Blank Media	3	18-01-2008 06:59
qsuite 2.1 and mkm 001	accat13	BenQ / Philips Burner	2	03-01-2008 23:21
Burning MKM-001	jcusimano2	CD and DVD Burners	4	07-10-2007 21:21
DW1650 doesnt support MKM A02 and MKM 001 ????	molnart	BenQ / Philips Burner	2	27-08-2007 09:21
MKM 001 on 212?	nekrosoft13	Asus / Pioneer Burner	7	06-08-2007 20:11