| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
| Video Edit Software Find out the best video edit software, learn about video edit magic and movie authoring. Discuss MPEG-4 and Super Video CD editing and authoring. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 103
| which will have better quality Which will have better quality; a movie compressed to a Divx file played on a Dvix stand alone dvd player, or the same Divx movie file blown back up through NERO played on a regular standalone dvd player? |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: West Texas
Posts: 2,222
| Re: which will have better quality If your movie is already in divx format, then playing it back on a stand alone player that has divx capabilty is the better choice. Any conversion will compromise quality somewhat, and Nero is a poor choice for conversion anyway. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 103
| Re: which will have better quality Quote:
I use nero because it is so easy. It does take 2 to 3 hours to convert a divx file. What is your do it all go to file conversion burning software? | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: West Texas
Posts: 2,222
| Re: which will have better quality I use a program called Procoder for avi to mpeg2 conversion, then DVDLab Pro to put it into dvd format with menus. Combined, that is about $750 worth of software, so you may not want to follow my lead on this. A lower cost alternative that uses a good encoding engine would be something like TMPGenc Author 3. And there are some free programs that use good encoders as well. FAVC is one, and if you use the HC encoder that is included, you will have excellent results. http://favcfavc.googlepages.com/ Make sure to install AviSynth and Net 2.0 (if you don't already have it). There are links on that page for those two necessary items, and both are free. Encoding times depends primarily on the speed of your cpu. Dual core cpus can speed this process up if the encoding programs are set up to utilize both cores. I normally use ImgBurn to do the actual burns to disk. It is a free program, and I highly recommend it. If you are not familiar with it, look through the guides at the ImgBurn forum. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: USA
Posts: 366
| Re: which will have better quality For the most part ConvertXtoDVD works well, especially for the majority of files that most seem to be concerned with, Xvid downloads with VBR audio. It's fast enough, uses pulldown (Nero and some others do not), produces a rudimentary menu if needed, and almost always produces results that are in sync. It can also do an acceptable job of converting PAL DVD's (movie only) to NTSC. There's only so much that can be done with the the quality compromised AVI's that folks seem to download. |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GQ (Great Quality) (Sony MID) Quality Variance | xdjoynerx | Blank Media | 9 | 04-08-2007 09:55 |
| Whats the different between High Quality and Super Long Play Quality? | tielurr | Newbie Forum | 1 | 24-05-2007 23:45 |
| Nero Vision - Audio quality tied to Video Quality? | lakecityransom | Nero & InCD | 2 | 27-01-2007 18:40 |
| High quality on computer, low quality on dvd disc... is it Nero? | Jon Dough | Nero & InCD | 0 | 20-05-2006 22:53 |
| is the quality/brand of my DVD drive going to affect the quality of the rip? | treza | Newbie Forum | 1 | 15-02-2006 09:36 |