Go Back   Club CDFreaks - Knowledge is Power > International Chat: Software related > Burning Software > Clone CD


Commercial message

Clone CD CloneCD is the ideal tool to make backup copies of your music or data CDs, regardless if they are copy protected or not! If you have problems, an opinion or a suggestion then please post here!



Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 22-04-2002   #1 (permalink)
CD Freaks Senior Member
 
Orinoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 485
Observations about copying SD2.51

Here are my findings whilst trying to backup C&C Renegade. I post them in case they may help someone work out why they are getting coasters when others are having no problem. As FutureProof has documented this is a tricky beast to copy, and the results are not always predictable.

First let me explain the why;

A friend of mine who is at college has a burner that will not duplicate SD2.51, so when he's home he comes round to me and I duplicate his games with my LTR-40125S. He then takes the backups to college and leaves the originals at his parents place.

So here's what happened.....

He got his copy of Renegade and came round to see me, I copied it and he went back to college and told me the game didn't run from the copy, he then downloaded the No CD fix and was happy.

I got my copy last week and did my own backup which worked fine first time, every time

We both have pretty similar PC's - both Dell, both with NEC-5700 DVD's both with 1.05 firmware. I used Clone CD 3.4.4.1 each time. My friend came back to see me this weekend past and, at my request, brought the old disks and some new blanks.

In my PC I would get about a 50% failure to authenticate the disk with his copy - burned on 'Memorex' branded disks [manufacturer unknown]. My copy was burned to 'Mr Data' blanks [again manufacturer unknown] and authenticated everytime.

I then burned another copy of Disk Two onto the Memorex blank he brought with him, and it worked every time.

So what did I do different second time;

Firstly; I read and wrote in the Lite-On, before I read in the NEC and wrote in the Lite-On.

Secondly; before the burn I updated the firmware of the Lite-On from ZS08 to ZS0A

Thirdly; I reduced the burn speed from 24x to 16x

---------------

So the moral of the story, well I'm not really sure, there is nothing here that I'd call conclusive. Others have posted about the burn speed being significant and my findings echo that, slower is more likely to give a working copy. Perhaps the hardware error correction of the Lite-On is better than that of the NEC and maybe the Firmware update has made the copy 'better' in some way.

If anyone can explain this then feel free I'd love to get to the bottom of this.

Last edited by Orinoco; 10-05-2002 at 13:50.
Orinoco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2002   #2 (permalink)
CD Freaks Senior Member
 
Orinoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 485
I was reading a post by OC-Freak about the burn speed shift of some drives and what happens at the point of the speed shift
Quote:
Originally posted by OC-Freak
.... all Zone-CLV writers ... switch off the laser when speeding up to next speed level. .......

This is normal and should never cause any problems since the gap is shorter than gaps caused by dust(that's so small that it's nearly invisible) on the disc. Those very tiny gaps is easily corrected by the drives error correction functions and you will never notice them.
So how's this for a theory;


So maybe the speed shift does induce an error on the disk, which is picked up by the SD2.51 check and causes the problems some people have spoken about with SD2.51 killer burners not correctly backing the disk up. I know that pretty much every backup I do at Max speed fails the copy protection check one time in about 5, but burnt at a constant speed [I chose 16x as a test] the backup works each time every time. That has been proved with Max Payne and C&C Renegade so far.
__________________
Make it up..? Life is bad enough as it is. Why would I want to invent more of it! - Marvin

Windows XP Pro SP2 + hotfixes, Core2Quad Q6600 2.4GHz, MSI P35 Platinum, 4096MB DDR2-800 (4x 1024MB), ASUS E616A2 (fw. 1.03), Pioneer DVR-111D (fw. 1.23), Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB + 320GB 16Mb S300, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT (512Mb)
Orinoco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2002   #3 (permalink)
Senior Moderator
 
G@M3FR3@K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Utrèg, The Netherlands
Posts: 8,777
Interesting theory but I don't think Z-CLV recording introduces an error to the disc. When switching zones the gap is about 1 micron and too small to be noticeable. Then what is the reason for your results? Well I don't know. Maybe, just maybe, the switching of the write speed occurs when writing the 'weak sectors'. This confirms your theory but I have no idea if this is the case so I (we) can be totally wrong here. More tests would be welcome people!
__________________
CDFreaks.com - Independent CD and DVD recording news around the clock!
Become a member of this forum, it's free! Register here!
G@M3FR3@K is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
copied SD2.51 MOHAA but not old SD2 Max Payne KenL Burning Software 0 07-04-2002 16:26
question about sd2 no 2.51 quirky9 Plextor Burner 2 04-04-2002 15:12
New Plex vs. SD2.51 info ... G@M3FR3@K Clone CD 11 17-02-2002 16:22
Sd2.51&LgGCE8160b glottis Clone CD 1 12-02-2002 11:40


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0