| |||||||
| Commercial message | |
| | |
|
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: On a farm.
Posts: 393
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. First, I want to say I think ImgBurn is a great application--particularly for advanced users. I guess I am not that advanced. I have noticed that if you use v.2.2's Read at default settings to create a duplicate of a disc previously burned with CD-DVD Speed's create disc and added text data to record the burner and the burn curve, all this is copied onto the duplicate as well. Just for everyone's information(not a complaint). I think this can be avoided using ImgBurn's settings. I used the previous versions 2.0 and 2.1 without major problems with my LG H12N, burning probably about 30 discs, mostly video backups. However, I must be goofing up big when I use it with my LH-20A1P, because I have already created two coasters. Both times the program, the drive, and my whole system get hung severely during the leadin. I'm not implying it's ImgBurn, it could be the Lite-ON or it could be me. But each time it coastered, I switched and used ImgBurn to burn the image with the LG--No Problemo. So I guess what I am saying is that if you are rookie like me, this program is not for the timid hearted. Thanks, Lightning: I will continue to use the program because I am not the timid kind when it comes to trying out new software. ![]()
__________________ Useful software with my burner: DVDFab+++++DVDShrink+++++ImgBurn+++++CD-DVD Speed |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Author of DVD Decrypter & ImgBurn Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: UK
Posts: 630
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. The data CD-DVD Speed adds to the disc is just part of the disc. It modifies the actual data so you'll never have a true 1:1 copy because there will always be that little bit extra shoved on the end. As ImgBurn does what it's supposed to (read the whole disc), the data it reads will of course include the bit stuck on the end too. As with any I/O stuff, when drives/drivers misbehave, the whole system grinds to a halt. I would guess that your LG just likes the discs you're using better than the LiteOn does, or that the LiteOn has other issues with it's firmware. I've not noticed any issues with the 18x LiteOn drives.
__________________ The Official ImgBurn Website |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| New on Forum Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Great Software! I even donated and I am not one who usually does that. Perhaps this is the wrong place to ask but...is it possible to allow WindowsXP Home "Limited Users" access the burner? I installed Nero burning rights to allow myself to do this but is there an even easier way? |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) | |
| Moderator & Software Editor Join Date: May 2005 Location: Watching you
Posts: 12,379
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Quote:
![]()
__________________ I do not provide technical support over E-mail or Private Message Please post your questions on the Forum Sign up to CD Freaks Register Here FORUM RULES Need some help ? Please use our search function first Join us on the CDFreaks Folding@Home Team! Read more here Get WinDWFlash HERE My Computer specs are HERE | |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) | |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Quote:
PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-108 1.20 (ATA) Current Profile: DVD+R Disc Information: Status: Empty Erasable: No Free Sectors: 2,295,104 Free Space: 4,700,372,992 bytes Free Time: 510:03:29 (MM:SS:FF) Supported Write Speeds: 4x, 6x, 8x, 12x Physical Format Information (ADIP): Disc ID: SONY-D21-00 Book Type: DVD+R Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: Not Specified Number of Layers: 1 Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP) Linear Density: 0.267 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 2,491,711 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 0 Physical Format Information (Last Recorded): Disc ID: SONY-D21-00 Book Type: DVD+R Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: Not Specified Number of Layers: 1 Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP) Linear Density: 0.267 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 2,491,711 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 0 It will burn 3 or 4 discs with no problem then hang about 75%-80% finished. No error code most of the time - it just sits there. Sometimes it does give an error stating something about device error with a long string of numbers xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx etc... Using NERO or UltraISO I can burn 30 in a row with no coasters ever. With ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 I have to shut down and reboot. Any ideas? | |
| | |
| | #31 (permalink) | |||
| Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Denmark
Posts: 14,363
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. This program is just getting better and better! Thanks LIGHTNING_UK!! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup. | |||
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Rookie Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 34
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Pardon my ignorance, but I've been using Roxio 8 EZ DVD Media Creator to burn iso's, with good success. Are there any benefits to using this over Roxio's engine? On a similar note, I've also created iso data images using Roxio 8. Are there added benefits to using DVD Decrypter instead to create iso's.? Thanks! |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,439
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Never got on well with Roxio... I'd think anything would be an improvement IMHO!
__________________ My favorite daily burning drives: Plextor 712A - 1.09 LG 55N - 1.05 BenQ 1640 Grey OEM - BSMB LG 22N - 1.02 My favorite media: RicohJPNR01, RicohJPNR03, MCC003, MCC004, OptodiscR16 Testing: NEC AD-7200A, LiteOn 20A3P |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) | |
| Moderator & Software Editor Join Date: May 2005 Location: Watching you
Posts: 12,379
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Quote:
![]()
__________________ I do not provide technical support over E-mail or Private Message Please post your questions on the Forum Sign up to CD Freaks Register Here FORUM RULES Need some help ? Please use our search function first Join us on the CDFreaks Folding@Home Team! Read more here Get WinDWFlash HERE My Computer specs are HERE | |
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,279
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. I have always favored nero since it likes me(jk) and I had a hard time with build mode and not using the video_ts folder for my shrink output after changing the build settings to don't prompt image details ditto video ts content and volume label/answer yes pop a dvd in, point imgburn to the folder and click burn bingo, that's easier than nero I don't like to autoburn as I like to check my compressed/authored product before committing to dvd iso's are too much hassle
__________________ Chewy |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: @FX labs .de ...watching [Benders.Big.Score] [Tripping.The.Rift.The.Movie]
Posts: 24,199
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Quote:
![]()
__________________ Started with burning capable optical drives (CD-R) in 1997. Bought optical drives from AOpen, HP, LiteOn, NEC, Philips, Pioneer, Plextor, Ricoh, Samsung, Sanyo, Toshiba and Yamaha. 'Things are now in motion that cannot be undone.' [Gandalf, LoTR] Enable DMA with micrAp$0ft Enable DMA free at your will busTRACE => Upper/Lower Filters Util DevCon ***HOW TO ... Delete the Upper & Lower Filters!*** If you expect help then please start by using the powerful SEARCH. | |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) | |
| CD Freaks Die Hard Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Canada Region 1
Posts: 1,781
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Quote:
__________________ System #1: Microsoft Windows Xp Pro 2002 SP3/Windows XP Pro X64 Edition 2003 SP2. AMD Phenom (tm) 9550 Quad Core Processor 2.20 GHz. 4 x 2GB of RAM. Samsung TSSTcorp SH-S203B (SB01 patched), Pioneer DVR-215D (1.18 patched), LG HL-DT-ST GSA H62N (CL01), Plextor PX-716A (1.11), BenQ #2 DW-1620 (B7W9) & externals BenQ #3 Ew-1621 (47P9), BenQ #1 EW-1621 (47L9), LG GSA-H10N (JL12). System #2: Microsoft Windows Xp Pro 2002 SP3. AMD Athlon(tm) 64 x 2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ 2.31 GHz 4 GBs RAM. Samsung SH-S182D (SB06), Samsung SH-S202J (SB01), Plextor PX-810SA (1.01), Samsung SH-S203B (SB03 FB FR). System specs as of 07052008 | |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) | |
| Moderator, Editor & CD Freaks Guru Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Italy
Posts: 17,725
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Quote:
You can rip a disc at 1x or at 20x, but copied files will be identical. Only a damaged cable or a damaged controller can introduce errors in files. Also a defective driver can introduce errors, but again the ripping speed has no influence on data integrity.
__________________ Click here or here to download latest version of CD-DVD Speed Click here to read more about DMA User guide for CD-DVD Speed: English version - Versione Italiana User guide for ImgBurn in BUILD mode English version - Italian version KTPHTT | |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) |
| Moderator, Editor & CD Freaks Guru Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Italy
Posts: 17,725
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. If you don't want to rip at a slower speed (and this will require a longer time to complete the job) for some reason, max is the best choice in my opinion. Bear in mind that if for some reason the drive is not able to read the disc at max speed (because of scratches on the disc for example), it will slow automatically the reading ![]()
__________________ Click here or here to download latest version of CD-DVD Speed Click here to read more about DMA User guide for CD-DVD Speed: English version - Versione Italiana User guide for ImgBurn in BUILD mode English version - Italian version KTPHTT |
| | |
| | #46 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Ok thank you. Just to clarify if I set the read speed to something like 8X would it try to read at 8X or simply read at a safe speed? In fact inder IMGBurn settings the check for setting read speed is not selected by default so I believe it is on MAX. Thanks. |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) |
| Moderator, Editor & CD Freaks Guru Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Italy
Posts: 17,725
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Setting options as shown in pic, ImgBurn will read at max speed. If you set, for example, 8x the drive should read the disc up to 8x max.
__________________ Click here or here to download latest version of CD-DVD Speed Click here to read more about DMA User guide for CD-DVD Speed: English version - Versione Italiana User guide for ImgBurn in BUILD mode English version - Italian version KTPHTT |
| | |
| | #49 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Die Hard Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Canada Region 1
Posts: 1,781
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. Leave it as is, unless you have problems.
__________________ System #1: Microsoft Windows Xp Pro 2002 SP3/Windows XP Pro X64 Edition 2003 SP2. AMD Phenom (tm) 9550 Quad Core Processor 2.20 GHz. 4 x 2GB of RAM. Samsung TSSTcorp SH-S203B (SB01 patched), Pioneer DVR-215D (1.18 patched), LG HL-DT-ST GSA H62N (CL01), Plextor PX-716A (1.11), BenQ #2 DW-1620 (B7W9) & externals BenQ #3 Ew-1621 (47P9), BenQ #1 EW-1621 (47L9), LG GSA-H10N (JL12). System #2: Microsoft Windows Xp Pro 2002 SP3. AMD Athlon(tm) 64 x 2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ 2.31 GHz 4 GBs RAM. Samsung SH-S182D (SB06), Samsung SH-S202J (SB01), Plextor PX-810SA (1.01), Samsung SH-S203B (SB03 FB FR). System specs as of 07052008 |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) |
| CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
| Re: ImgBurn 2.2.0.0 is out. I was just testing my two drives to check read speed. I have a BenQ1620 and LiteOn H6S, they both should read at 16X right? I tested them with read speed set at 16X, MAX, and 8X. When I set the BenQ1620 to 16X and started reading, it prompted me I selected 16X while actual read speed will be 8X. On all three settings the BenQ reached a max read of 8X, and an average of 5.5 for all three reads. Shouldnt it be reading at 16X? As for the LiteOn tested it on all three settings as well. It prompted me that actual read speed would be 12.1. However, on all three settings it topped out at 8.2 and averaged 5.7. Is this right? Or is something amiss? |
| | |
| |
| |
![]() |
| If you can't find where you are looking for, then become a member and get an answer fast! We have thousands of people online every moment of the day to help you! Click here |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ImgBurn | Halio | Newbie Forum | 5 | 12-06-2007 10:11 |
| Imgburn | eyedea2011 | ImgBurn | 1 | 13-03-2007 07:45 |
| ImgBurn | receptor99 | ImgBurn | 4 | 08-05-2006 00:58 |
| ImgBurn | DaChew | ImgBurn | 11 | 09-01-2006 19:47 |