Go Back   Club CDFreaks - Knowledge is Power > International Chat: High Definition > Blu-ray and HD DVD Hardware, Software and Blank Media


Commercial ads


Blu-ray and HD DVD Hardware, Software and Blank Media Discuss, Best balance between Quality vs. Size compressed at International Chat: High Definition forum; I just got the Lite-On DH-401S-08 and started experimenting with backing up my blue-ray discs. My main reason for doing this is so that I wouldn't have to hear the noise of the drive while I'm watching a movie. I haven't found the


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19-02-2008   #1 (permalink)
New on Forum
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6
Best balance between Quality vs. Size compressed

I just got the Lite-On DH-401S-08 and started experimenting with backing up my blue-ray discs. My main reason for doing this is so that I wouldn't have to hear the noise of the drive while I'm watching a movie.

I haven't found the best bitrate for divx compression yet but I wanted to post my findings. The only big difference in quality I could see after comparing side by side a couple of times is when there is fast movement, you will see some blurring and blocks but it's really not that bad. I am going to try 2-pass encoding tonight and maybe bump up the bitrate a bit to see what I get. (1-pass took about 5 hours to compress, 2-pass 8 hours)

Another major advantage is the h.264 decoding almost takes up all my cpu while divx only used about 11~50%.

Ratatouille:
TS file after tsremux twice with 1 Dolby audio stream: 20,491,457,620 bytes
4000kbps 1-pass divx compression: 3,450,216,208 bytes
(both of these files are the same resolution and length)

Please post your findings and some comparison comments.
tdashmike is offline   Reply With Quote
AltToday
CD Freaks

Beitrag
__________________
This advertising will not be shown to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Club CD Freaks - Knowledge is Power
Old 19-02-2008   #2 (permalink)
CDFreaks Resident
 
CDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,805
Re: Best balance between Quality vs. Size compressed

Most people will object to DIVX video at 1080 with only 4Mb bitrates, especially on screens larger than 40". Reducing to 720 will have a big positive effect on the compression artifacts.
CDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2008   #3 (permalink)
New on Forum
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6
Re: Best balance between Quality vs. Size compressed

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDan View Post
Most people will object to DIVX video at 1080 with only 4Mb bitrates, especially on screens larger than 40". Reducing to 720 will have a big positive effect on the compression artifacts.
Do you mean use h.264 re-encode instead?
__________________
Intel E6400@2.8Ghz
2GB DDR-1066
ehhh....will get detailes in later
tdashmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-02-2008   #4 (permalink)
Admin & Review Coordinator N.America
 
zevia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 9,810
Re: Best balance between Quality vs. Size compressed

Which applications did you use to convert? DivX Converter?

I think what CDan meant is to use the "HD 720p" settings.
__________________
Click here to join CDFreaks.com

Join CDFreaks Distributed Computing Team, have fun while helping to save some lives!

My review PC & Specs & Media
Blu-ray to DVD guide

Forum Rules | Blu-ray UDF Driver
BenQ/Philips FAQ and tools: BQFlasher, MCSE, WOPC Tool, WinDWFlash

LG BE06LU11 Blu-ray | LG GGW-H10N Blu-ray/HD-DVD | LG GBW-H10N Blu-ray | Panasonic SW-5582 Blu-ray
zevia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2008   #5 (permalink)
New on Forum
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6
Re: Best balance between Quality vs. Size compressed

Quote:
Originally Posted by zevia View Post
Which applications did you use to convert? DivX Converter?

I think what CDan meant is to use the "HD 720p" settings.
I used Dr. DivX Insane setting.
__________________
Intel E6400@2.8Ghz
2GB DDR-1066
ehhh....will get detailes in later
tdashmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2008   #6 (permalink)
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,276
Re: Best balance between Quality vs. Size compressed

i wouldn't use divx for files like this.

MKV contrainer with H264 is much better
__________________
main system
Samsung SH-S223F
LG GGW-H20L
server/media server
Lite-on LH-20A1S
Pioneer DVR-111D @ 111L (LABELFLASH!)
Samsung SH-S182M
BenQ DW1655
family system
BenQ DW1620 Pro (soon to be retired)
NEC ND-3550A @ 4551A (LABELFLASH!)
soon to be used in HTPC
Samsung SH-S203B
nekrosoft13 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


If you can't find where you are looking for, then become a member and get an answer fast! We have thousands of people online every moment of the day to help you! Click here


Can't find where you are looking for? Search our knowledgebase!
 




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Biggest file size to retain quality matrixlu VSO Software 1 10-01-2007 08:36
ConvertXtoDVD Quality/Size Question TheJesusWarranty VSO Software 9 20-06-2006 14:50
Screen Size Vertically Compressed? eastley Copy Movie 2 01-05-2006 21:45
How can I shrink the size of a DVD without losing quality? Latrosicarius Video Edit Software 5 03-03-2006 02:51
Problem with quality/file size prediction black prince DVD2One 17 05-03-2003 06:21


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0