| Just for feed back... from what I've seen in the demo and from other people's responses, I think we are quite content with the quality. Yes, there is always room for improvement, especially for those who are trying to compare it to CCE quality, which is a bit unfair and somewhat un-realistic, which would take time. But say we, for the most part agreed that we are satisfied with the quality and we, the consumer, wish to keep the encoder quality the same but just add new features... would that be so bad? Or is it truly, as you said, "We need to make the encoder a bit better in handling image quality if we want to do 1:1 copies". Meaning that, it is not possible to accomplish this with the current encoder. Then, if this be the case, we have to understand and patiently wait. |