Club CDFreaks - Knowledge is Power - View Single Post

o0RaidR0o · 31-01-2003

I tried both LOTR and Scarface. I have a AthlonXP 2100+, 768MB PC2100, Seagate 80GB drive, XP Pro SP1. Scarface had a lot of artifacts. LOTR although better still produced artifacts to this critical eye. However I'm still very impressed in which the little time it took to re-encode the movies. Considering I picked two of the longer titles out there as a test. AS it was suggested in one of the posts I'm sure I will see better results with smaller titles that are still slightly to big to fit on a DVD5 but DVD2ONE can handle with quality. Looking forward to continued testing and also future releases that will address longer titles.

However I am still open to any suggestions that may help in optimizing DVD2ONE's process.

Thanks...

31-01-2003	#6 (permalink)
o0RaidR0o New on Forum Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: South Florida Posts: 13	Hmmm.... I tried both LOTR and Scarface. I have a AthlonXP 2100+, 768MB PC2100, Seagate 80GB drive, XP Pro SP1. Scarface had a lot of artifacts. LOTR although better still produced artifacts to this critical eye. However I'm still very impressed in which the little time it took to re-encode the movies. Considering I picked two of the longer titles out there as a test. AS it was suggested in one of the posts I'm sure I will see better results with smaller titles that are still slightly to big to fit on a DVD5 but DVD2ONE can handle with quality. Looking forward to continued testing and also future releases that will address longer titles. However I am still open to any suggestions that may help in optimizing DVD2ONE's process. Thanks...