Club CDFreaks - Knowledge is Power - View Single Post

little-endian · 22-04-2002

@swift

I made a little test with EAC v0.9b11.
I read the first and the last track of an audio-CD.
I used my UltraPlex 40max with burst-mode (secure gives the same results) because it's much faster.

And really!!

If you use an offset correction of +588 samples, you'll have missing samples. With the values +587 and +589 I have no problems, at all. This is really strange! First I thought that this issue is only cosmetic, but I compared the two (three) waves and the one ripped @ +588 is definately shorter!

Maybe you have found a bug ....

22-04-2002	#15 (permalink)
little-endian CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Germany Posts: 280	@swift I made a little test with EAC v0.9b11. I read the first and the last track of an audio-CD. I used my UltraPlex 40max with burst-mode (secure gives the same results) because it's much faster. And really!! If you use an offset correction of +588 samples, you'll have missing samples. With the values +587 and +589 I have no problems, at all. This is really strange! First I thought that this issue is only cosmetic, but I compared the two (three) waves and the one ripped @ +588 is definately shorter! Maybe you have found a bug ....