At the present state of discussion I have to ask something:
I use take in consideration these tests called
« correlation tests » that you can find in some reviews of recent burners.
In these tests they compare how the burner reviewed and the CATS report the sanning errors:
they compare
the trend more than absolute values.
For example here is what you can find for 2 of the « good scanners » after Dee’s article:
Plextor PX-760A:
« PX-760A vs CATS - Page 1, 2, 3 & 4 »
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Revi...6587&PageId=19
The conclusion of each of the 4 pages:
Lite-On SHW-16H5S (firmware LS0W)
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Revi...5954&PageId=19
Conclusion of each of the 4 pages :
So could know somebody explain to me
if these correlation tests are of any value in order to decide if a scanner is better than an other one or not ?
In other words
may I use a burner that has a bad correlation test
as well as a burner with a good correlation test ?