What i said is that it's too expensive, now and in the future, because it doesn't mean that you have to buy a new player, but also new HD TV and HD sound receiver. And those of you that went on to buy a new HD set when they where out............ well, you have to buy another one because that one doesn't have HDCP. This means that Hollywood is joking with us.
And again DVD is good enought for sets up to 42", bigger than that, well who can buy an 42" TV isn't the common people, so it makes no difference for the HDDVD Success.
And again, SACD and DVD-Audio are realy better than cd, as HDDVD is realy better than DVD, but where are they? I don't see SACD and DVD-Audio on retail stores as i see cd's.
I'm no caveman as haveacigar said, i just think before throw away my money. Does this things realy will improve my Home Cinema expirience? I don't think so. I've my DVD connected to my 32" TV with component cable and the picture is excelent, it seams like a window with real people on the other sidde, so why would i need HD?
I'm not an early adopter like some of you, i'm just one of the billions of average people out there, that have more where to spend their money, than in these HD discs that i belive that the main reason that hollywood is so ancious to have them out, is that they will be harder to copy, if not impossible!?
Just one more thing, i think that HD TV Transmissions is a good thing because SD TV is realy bad compared to DVD, but that only means that you have a new set top box and hoock it up to your normal tv set that you see the difference, now the DVD to HDDVD difference..............