View Single Post
Old 23-08-2005   #117 (permalink)
Nemesys
CDFreaks Resident
 
Nemesys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 1,079
Re: Why You Should Dump Internet Explorer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raziel_BG
Before i continue: this is a comparison between Opera and IE. FF is left out due to lack of experience with it.
FF and Opera beta browers? That's a good one. It doesn't matter what the damn reason is, IE is most exploited. With so many security issues discovered does it still count as 'final'? IE is closer to being beta than FF or Opera, whether you like it or not. I DO think that if FF or Opera switch places with IE, they will be the most exploited. Until then FF and Opera will remain safer. It doesn't matter if you win a race by an inch or a mile. Winning is winning.
I'm using Opera and i don't think i'll switch to another browes anytime soon.
Why not IE?
- I want configurability - IE can't be configured the way Opera (or FF) can. I'm not speaking about security only but about convenience by work. IE is not convenient.
- I want pages to be loaded faster - heard it, tested it, seen it. Opera is faster than IE.
- I want tabbed browsing - IE doesn't support such modern and convenient things. IE7 would? Well, i'm not installing SP2 just because of one silly browser. I'm sick of being forced to upgrade IF i want to use a certain product. This is pathetic crap.
- The only two integrated things in Windows i DO like are Notepad and the calculator. My practice shows that in 99.9% of the cases it's better to use an alternative product and NOT the one in Windows. Zip support is there and it sucks, burning support is there and it sucks, defragmenter is available and it sucks, firewall is available and it sucks etc.
They are free? From one perspective they are. You get them when you install windows, that's why they're BASIC and sucky. Because they're free. Why should MS try harder when there's no need (kinda logical, i must admit) - those things are free and complains are out of the question. MS wash their hands saying these integrated programs provide ONLY BASIC support and users should install 3rd party software products if they want further support. From a different perspective, however, they're not COMPLETELY free. You do get them with Windows but you pay for Windows, don't you? Just like those commercials: 'Buy this great chef's knife for only $200 and get a free set of steak knives, a knife for cutting fruits, a knife for cutting carpets etc.' The example is made up but the principle is the same. Those other things are included in the price but reffered to as FREE. The average Joe says: 'Cool, maaan, look how many cool knives i get for buying one big one.'
IE falls in the same category as those 'FREE' products.
- IE looks dull, Opera supports skins. True, some people don't like colorful stuff but who said Opera can't look neat & tidy and still NOT boring.
- Opera has a download manager, IE has the function to download files if you get the difference.
- I find Opera to be very well optimized. All this in less than 4MB. IE has larger program code for far less functions. I guess it's because people who make IE are being paid like this $/LoC (amount for every line of code). By Opera and FF it's the other way around.
- Opera has a very helpful feature, rarely needed but nice to have, Zoom it is called.
- Customization by Opera is at an excellent level whereas by IE the only thing customizable is removing or adding buttons from an already defined list. What freedom, what joy, i removed a button.
- Opera has the option to load only cached images in addition to NO images and ALL images. IE has the latter two and you have to complete a quest to get to these options.
- Opera has the ability to save sessions and if a crash occurs you can resume surfing where you left it. With IE God help you not to run into trouble if you have a lot of pages opened and your work is important.
- Opera has the ability to open again once closed tab. So if you accidentally close a page you can re-open it with a few clicks.

The sad part is there are still badly written pages that IE can read and some with streaming media that IE handles better because WMP and its associated formats are property of MS as well as IE. What a coincidence.

I'll sum up:
Opera is about customization and convenience by surfing.
IE is about boredom and conservatism.
Like i said before, this is comparison between Opera and IE. FF is not involved.

I'm sorry for the long post but couldn't stand passive.
Thanks for the biased comparison.
I use all three browsers so I can speak from experience.
With all of the fine points that you glorified Opera with, there still remains one problem.
There are still many web sites that I cannot access with Opera and have to revert to Internet Explorer to access. So all of those accolades are useless to me if the browser cannot achieve the simple task for which it was designed.........browsing the Internet.

My needs are very simple, I don't care for tabbed browsing, pop-up blocking, extensions and all of that exotic crap. I just want to know that the browser can securely get me where I want to go. Both Opera and Firefox has failed to do this on too many occasion for me to consider them as replacements for IE. They are simply beta alternatives for the times when web sites require me to relax the security configurations on Internet Explorer, and at that they sometimes still don't fare any bettter. I'm not looking for a feature rich browser, all I seek is a secure browser that can get me to any web site at anytime.

It's that simple. Or is it?

But all in all, I would absolutely choose Opera over Firefox every single time.
__________________
Case: Chieftec Dragon Golden Blue DX-01BLD-U Server Chassis Motherboard: ABIT IP35 Pro CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz @ 4.0GHz (Tuniq Tower 120 CPU Cooling) RAM: 2GB Crucial Ballistix PC-8500 DDR2 1066 Video Card: GeForce 7900GT 256MB PCI Express x16 Sound Card: SoundBlaster Audigy ES Monitor: Hanns-G HW-223DPB (22” LCD) Audio System: MASSIVE NIC: Dual Realtek Gigabit Ethernet Controller
DVD-RAM: Samsung SH-S203B SB04
DVD-RAM: Lite-On LH-20A1L BL06
Hard Drive (Internal Storage): Seagate Barracuda 500GB SATA II File Storage
Hard Drive (Removables): (3) LIAN-LI SATA Mobile Racks
Drive #1. Seagate Barracuda 320GB SATA II WIN XP Professional
Drive #2. Seagate Barracuda 320GB SATA II WIN Vista Ultimate
Drive #3. Seagate Barracuda 80G SATA II Testing


http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=364264
Nemesys is offline   Reply With Quote